Jiang Zemin was the Chinese ex-president who praticed the most important genocide in the recent China history. However he murdered million innocent people in China by the belief in the principles, Benevolence and Tolerance like improvement in the ethical values of the people and by the simple practice of exercises and meditation. This essay will examine some arguments against and favor about how these ethical values were the reason to commit the assassination.
Zemin will have to confront the accusation of to have promoted the death of thousands of medical instructors of Falun Gong under horrible tortures, of to have promoted tens of thousand of illegal haltings and income caused in against of the will of the people in fields of forced works and mental hospitals under a regime of slavery and horrible tortures.
In Addition, the lawyer Carlos Iglesias indicated when presenting the complaint that the pretension of Jiang Zeming and its accomplices in these crimes of which they accuse themselves to them was the elimination of Falun Gong like national group and group with beliefs of high morality and ethics derived from the own essence of the Chinese town.
On the other hand, Zemi pretended to kill the Falun Group because considered its has a series of absurd concepts like "prominent coming of the aim of the world" and "promt destruction of to human", also it alleges that before it modern science is impotent and none government has remedy. These reasons were the basis by which Zemi make a decision to act according to Tolerance and Benevolence. Tolerance and Benevolence were the ethical values that his political and authoritarian familiy instil him during his childhood.
To sum up, I consider ethical values must to be the guide to improve our behaviour not the reason to kill people. Maybe Zemin confused the meaning of act into real Tolerance and Benelolence. If he was thinking in tolerance, he wouldn´t tortured or murdered under the direction of an organized plan to eliminate the national group called Falun Gong.
